AI Statement

On authorship and tools

At Pipeline, we are drawn to musical theatre that feels unmistakably made by a mind encountering its own questions in real time. Work that carries the texture of decision-making, risk, revision, and human negotiation with form. We believe that the most compelling new musicals emerge from lived creative intelligence, artists thinking through material, not outsourcing it. Our dramaturgical practice is built around supporting that process: the friction, uncertainty, and specificity that comes from human authorship in conversation with collaborators. 


We recognize that artists now work within an expanding ecosystem of tools. If generative AI has been part of your development process in any capacity, we simply ask to understand that context.  Not as a judgment, but because we are attentive to how a piece thinks itself into being; and what kinds of tools are present in its formation.  Different tools produce different kinds of work. To that end, our application features an inquiry into how AI has been utilized in the artistic process of the show. Our curatorial interest lies in work where the primary authorship is human-directed, and where the evolution of the piece is traceable to artistic decision-making rather than automated generation